Mitsubishi Lancer Gt 2014 Vs Kia Pro Cee D Gt 2014

Compare the 2014 Mitsubishi Lancer GT and the 2014 Kia Pro Cee’d GT to find out which compact car offers better performance, features, and value for money. Discover the key differences between these two popular models and make an informed decision before your next car purchase.

Feature Mitsubishi Lancer GT 2014 Kia Pro Cee’d GT 2014
Engine 2.4L Inline-4 1.6L Inline-4
Horsepower 168 hp 201 hp
Torque 167 lb-ft 195 lb-ft
Transmission 5-speed manual / 6-speed automatic 6-speed manual
Drive Type Front-wheel drive Front-wheel drive
Fuel Efficiency (City/Highway) 23/30 mpg 21/29 mpg
Seating Capacity 5 5
Length 180.0 inches 171.5 inches
Width 69.4 inches 70.3 inches
Height 58.7 inches 56.7 inches
Curb Weight 3,142 lbs 3,014 lbs
0-60 mph 7.5 seconds 7.4 seconds
Top Speed 130 mph 143 mph
Front Suspension MacPherson strut MacPherson strut
Rear Suspension Multi-link Torsion beam
Brakes (Front/Rear) Disc / Drum Disc / Disc
Steering Electric power-assist rack-and-pinion Electric power-assist rack-and-pinion
Wheels 18-inch alloy 18-inch alloy
Tires P215/45R18 P225/40R18
Fuel Tank Capacity 15.5 gallons 13.2 gallons

Engine

The Mitsubishi Lancer GT 2014 is equipped with a 2.4L Inline-4 engine, while the Kia Pro Cee’d GT 2014 has a smaller 1.6L Inline-4 engine. The Kia Pro Cee’d GT offers more horsepower and torque compared to the Mitsubishi Lancer GT.

Transmission

The Mitsubishi Lancer GT 2014 is available with a 5-speed manual or a 6-speed automatic transmission, whereas the Kia Pro Cee’d GT 2014 comes with a 6-speed manual transmission. Both cars offer options for manual gear shifting.

Fuel Efficiency

When it comes to fuel efficiency, the Mitsubishi Lancer GT 2014 has a slightly better rating with 23 mpg in the city and 30 mpg on the highway. The Kia Pro Cee’d GT 2014 offers 21 mpg in the city and 29 mpg on the highway, making it slightly less fuel-efficient.

Dimensions and Weight

The Mitsubishi Lancer GT 2014 is longer, wider, and taller compared to the Kia Pro Cee’d GT 2014. However, the Kia Pro Cee’d GT is lighter in weight, which can contribute to better agility and handling.

Performance

Both cars offer similar acceleration, with the Kia Pro Cee’d GT having a slightly faster 0-60 mph time of 7.4 seconds compared to the Mitsubishi Lancer GT’s 7.5 seconds. The Kia Pro Cee’d GT also has a higher top speed of 143 mph, while the Mitsubishi Lancer GT reaches a top speed of 130 mph.

Suspension and Brakes

The Mitsubishi Lancer GT 2014 features a MacPherson strut front suspension and a multi-link rear suspension, providing a balance between comfort and sportiness. The Kia Pro Cee’d GT 2014, on the other hand, has a MacPherson strut front suspension and a torsion beam rear suspension. Both cars come with disc brakes, but the Kia Pro Cee’d GT has disc brakes on both the front and rear wheels.

Steering and Wheels

Both the Mitsubishi Lancer GT 2014 and the Kia Pro Cee’d GT 2014 have electric power-assist rack-and-pinion steering systems, offering responsive and precise handling. They are also equipped with 18-inch alloy wheels, enhancing the overall sporty appearance of the vehicles.

Conclusion

In summary, the Kia Pro Cee’d GT 2014 offers a more powerful engine, better acceleration, and higher top speed compared to the Mitsubishi Lancer GT 2014. However, the Mitsubishi Lancer GT has a slight advantage in fuel efficiency and dimensions. The choice between the two ultimately depends on personal preferences regarding performance, fuel efficiency, and design.


Related Posts

Tcl 65c741k 65 Vs Samsung Crystal Uhd 4k Tu8079 55 2020
Samsung Class Tu8000 65 Vs Samsung Class Q80t 85
Samsung Class Q80b 85 Vs Philips 75pus7906 12 75
Philips 49pus7100 Vs Samsung Class Qn800b 85
Lg 75nano90upa 75 Vs Samsung Class Q70a 85
Philips 65oled705 12 65 Vs Philips 58pus8517 12 58
Philips 75pfl5704 F7 75 Vs Samsung Class Au8000 85
Lg 75up7760psb 75 Vs Lg 75qned75ura 75
Toshiba 43lf621u21 43 Vs Grundig 42 Vle 9270
Samsung Class Qn85b 85 Vs Samsung Class S95b 65
Samsung Ku650d 55 Vs Toshiba 55l510u18 55
Samsung Class Q80t 85 Vs Samsung Ks9500 55
Philips 75pul6673 F7 75 Vs Samsung Ue75cu8500 75
Toshiba 49l510u18 49 Vs Grundig 47 Vle 9270
Toshiba 43lf621u19 43 Vs Panasonic Th 75hx600k 75
Samsung Class Qn90b 85 Vs Samsung Class Qn95b 85
Lg 55ec9300 55 Vs Lg 55lm620
Toshiba 43lf621u19 43 Vs Samsung Class Au8000 85
Google News
LatestCompare.com | © Mobile Phone Comparison – Compare Mobile Phones