Samsung Crystal Uhd 4k Tu7095 65 Vs Samsung Qn90a 98

Discover the key differences between the Samsung Crystal UHD 4K TU7095 65 and the Samsung QN90A 98. Compare their features, picture quality, and performance to make an informed decision on your next TV purchase.

Feature Samsung Crystal UHD 4K TU7095 65 Samsung QN90A 98
Screen Size 65 inches 98 inches
Resolution 4K UHD (3840 x 2160) 4K UHD (3840 x 2160)
Display Technology Crystal UHD Quantum Dot
Backlighting Edge-lit LED Direct Full Array 32X
HDR Support Yes (HDR10+) Yes (HDR10+, HDR10, HLG)
Picture Engine Crystal Processor 4K Quantum Processor 4K
Refresh Rate 60Hz 120Hz
Smart TV Platform Tizen Tizen
Processor Quad-core Octa-core
RAM 2GB 6GB
Storage 8GB 16GB
Sound Output 20W 60W
Speaker Type 2CH 4.2.2CH
HDMI Ports 3 4
USB Ports 2 3
Bluetooth Yes Yes
Wi-Fi Yes Yes
Ethernet (LAN) Yes Yes
Dimensions (W x H x D) 1446.1 x 829.4 x 59.9 mm 2181.2 x 1256.8 x 25.4 mm
Weight 23.6 kg 61.7 kg

Screen Size

The Samsung Crystal UHD 4K TU7095 65 has a screen size of 65 inches, while the Samsung QN90A 98 boasts an enormous 98-inch display.

Resolution

Both models offer a 4K UHD resolution of 3840 x 2160 pixels, delivering sharp and detailed visuals.

Display Technology

The Crystal UHD TU7095 65 features Crystal UHD display technology, while the QN90A 98 utilizes Quantum Dot technology, providing enhanced color reproduction and contrast.

Backlighting

The TU7095 65 uses edge-lit LED backlighting, whereas the QN90A 98 employs Direct Full Array 32X backlighting, offering more precise control over brightness levels.

HDR Support

Both models support HDR (High Dynamic Range) content, with the TU7095 65 supporting HDR10+ and the QN90A 98 supporting HDR10+, HDR10, and HLG, ensuring vibrant and lifelike visuals.

Picture Engine

The TU7095 65 is equipped with a Crystal Processor 4K, while the QN90A 98 features a more advanced Quantum Processor 4K, optimizing picture quality and upscaling content.

Refresh Rate

The TU7095 65 has a refresh rate of 60Hz, while the QN90A 98 offers a higher refresh rate of 120Hz, resulting in smoother motion and reduced motion blur.

Smart TV Platform

Both models run on the Tizen smart TV platform, providing a user-friendly interface and access to various streaming services and apps.

Processor

The TU7095 65 is equipped with a quad-core processor, whereas the QN90A 98 boasts an octa-core processor, delivering faster and more efficient performance.

RAM

The TU7095 65 has 2GB of RAM, while the QN90A 98 offers a larger 6GB RAM capacity, allowing for smoother multitasking and app performance.

Storage

The TU7095 65 has 8GB of storage, while the QN90A 98 provides a larger 16GB storage capacity, enabling users to store more apps and media files.

Sound Output

The TU7095 65 delivers 20W of sound output, while the QN90A 98 offers a more powerful 60W sound output, resulting in a more immersive audio experience.

Speaker Type

The TU7095 65 has a 2CH speaker system, whereas the QN90A 98 features a more advanced 4.2.2CH speaker setup, producing richer and more detailed audio.

HDMI Ports

The TU7095 65 has 3 HDMI ports, while the QN90A 98 provides 4 HDMI ports, allowing for more connectivity options for external devices.

USB Ports

The TU7095 65 offers 2 USB ports, whereas the QN90A 98 provides 3 USB ports, enabling users to connect multiple USB devices simultaneously.

Bluetooth

Both models are equipped with Bluetooth technology, allowing for wireless connectivity with compatible devices such as headphones or speakers.

Wi-Fi

Both the TU7095 65 and the QN90A 98 feature built-in Wi-Fi, enabling seamless internet connectivity and access to online content.

Ethernet (LAN)

Both models have Ethernet (LAN) connectivity, providing a stable and reliable wired internet connection option.

Dimensions

The TU7095 65 measures 1446.1 x 829.4 x 59.9 mm, while the QN90A 98 has larger dimensions of 2181.2 x 1256.8 x 25.4 mm, ensuring a more immersive viewing experience.

Weight

The TU7095 65 weighs 23.6 kg, while the QN90A 98 is significantly heavier, weighing 61.7 kg, which should be considered for installation and placement purposes.


Related Posts

Htc Wildfire X vs Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Samsung Galaxy A7 2016 vs Samsung Galaxy M30
Oneplus 6t vs Oneplus 7t Pro
Htc Desire 320 vs Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo
General Mobile Gm 8 vs Huawei Honor 8s
Samsung Galaxy A50 vs Samsung Galaxy J3 2018
Xiaomi Mi Max 3 vs Google Nexus 6
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite vs Meizu 16t
Blackberry Keyone vs Samsung Galaxy Note 10
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite vs Oppo A5s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro vs Huawei P30 Lite
Samsung Galaxy Note 4 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8t
Lg G8 Thinq vs Oppo Reno2 Z
General Mobile Gm 8 vs Lenovo K9
Oppo A9 2020 vs Oppo R17
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8t vs Huawei Enjoy 10s
Huawei Mate 20 Lite vs Xiaomi Redmi Y3
Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus vs Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Google News
LatestCompare.com | © Mobile Phone Comparison – Compare Mobile Phones